Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 ... 10
1
Prince Harry / Re: What will Prince Harrys wedding be like ?
« Last post by Jmax2 on Today at 04:59:13 PM »
^^^ Didn't Diana wear the Spencer tiara?  Harry would need to ask his uncle for permission to have his bride wear that.
2
The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge / Re: Kate tougher than Diana
« Last post by dianab on Today at 04:27:33 PM »
I'm the worst biggest Diana fan, but I don't compare her to Kate. She would have been Kate's mother in law, and she had such a jealous streak I wonder if she would have allowed William to be close to anyone else.

A large difference is, as has been said, Diana hardly knew Charles nor he her. He didn't know he was getting a fragile young girl who needed a lot of attention. She said, I think, they met 13 times before the wedding. I know my postman better than that.

Whatever Kate's weaknesses are, William knows them by now and seems to love and understand her. He looks at her with such love. I think he married someone like his mother, very sweet, loving, and motherly. Diana said that she told him when you find someone you love you must guard it, take care and protect it. He is doing that in the face of much criticism from some.

The man looks suicidal or at best bored out of his mind...and yep this is what love looks like...

Prince William and Kate Middleton :censored:ing at each other again?... (Cheltenham Festival) - YouTube

If he was so protective of her perhaps he shouldn't have let her get naked outside when she could be photographed from three different angels!!!
As much I always disagree with you, Eri in this I agree. Suicidal is bit too much, IMO. But as I read in another forum: someone else should talk to William as much happy he is because obviously he dont know :lol: :lol: :lol:
   
Quote
So far Kate seems
Quote
smarter

IMO the France ep shows her spectacular level of stupidity, particularly, too soon after the Harry at LV ep. If an famous person is in a place open to outside must have COMMON SENSE not get naked in this place because there's big probability this person will BE photograped.
 
Quote
better educated

She have an degree and resolved made nothing with it. In her royal duties I even now see nothing that put her above of someone else without degree (read:I dont see she tell anything intelligent or at least shows interested, IMO that's an thing that Charles & Diana had in common they were always interested in their work and that always showed)
Quote
more grounded

Well, she made of her whole adult life only be available for an Prince, that at times was no gentleman with her and allowed her mother pushed her to always fogive the Prince. Who broke-up with her at times because he wanted see others girls, when he do NOT find anyone he was back to her and she accept & always with the support of Mummy. 
I also find incredible childish an woman in her age, including pregnant, with such obsession in wear mini skirts. :orchid:
Quote
and more emotionally stable
For all what's known & reported, what seems me is Kate dont bear the adult life on her own, particularly WITHOUT Mummy.
For all what's known & reported, IMO, Kate have the mentality of an 24 years old person.
I agree with those with opinion that during the engagement she seemed want turn into anorexic and in all probability have some issue with food. IMO since the engagement is clear she have an fixation/obsession in get so thin as possible.

IMO Kate is many things less an strong & independent person.
3
Quote
Prince Charles was accosted by an "old friend" during a visit to a school in Stoke-on-Trent.

The woman ran up to the Prince outside The Co-operative Academy and when stopped by security, insisted: "I know him!"

Prince Charles accosted by 'old friend' on school visit - ITV News 

Cindy
4
Prince Harry / Re: What will Prince Harrys wedding be like ?
« Last post by NotWaitieKatie on Today at 04:21:13 PM »
I hope she wears the one Diana always used. Kate got the ring so that should go to Harry's wife.
5
Quote
Camilla - known then as Milla - was a regular tomboy with an extrovert personality

Pretty attractive qualities right there.  :thumbsup:  If we all looked and acted the same it would make for a dull society.  :Lothwen: imo.

Quote
. This insults towards Camilla and Wallis' looks reminds me of Anne Boleyn who was also viewed as not being attractive enough for a king
.

Anne wasn't the sterotypical beauty that was blonde. She was viewed as exotic until things went sour and opinions of her turned into calling her a witch with a mole on her neck and six-fingers on one hand.  :shrug:
6
I've seen pix of Camilla when young and I was stunned by how attractive she was, there is one pic of Wallis when she was you g where she also looks attractive, both these women aged fast and hard and by the time they came on the national scene they were way pass their prime. This insults towards Camilla and Wallis' looks reminds me of Anne Boleyn who was also viewed as not being attractive enough for a king.
7
Quote
“I have commisioned and composed a piece for the garden that will play very quietly while it is on show,” Blom adds. “I think it is the first time that there has been music in a garden at the Flower Show on every day, rather than just on the press day.


Lovely and tranquil. :)
8
Damn right!  When William assumes the throne, it'll be Diana's genes up there, not Camilla's.  Charles's former married mistress will have nothing to do with the continuance of the House of Windsor.  Britain "warming up to her" will be a moot point.

IMHO, of course.

Who cares about genes? To my knowledge Queen Catherine Parr had no Royal children with King Henry VIII and is fondly remembered in history. Queen Catherine of Braganza bore no children with King Charles II and is still greatly admired and remembered through times. In my opinion, your point is the moot point here.  :P

The Duchess of Cornwall is and will remain in the history books. As will all other people who have had any sort of relation to the Monarchy.

Good points Windsor,  having children on the throne doesn't change that Camilla as Queen can still make a huge impact. Katharine of Aragon is revered for herself not just for being the mother of Queen Mary. Bringing up Diana's genes just seems like another lame attempt to make Diana the winner in a war with Camilla that should have ended years ago. I believe Camilla would have been content to be Charles invisible mistress for the rest of her life. So why the heck would she care that she doesn't have a child who will reign over England.
9
The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge / Re: Where Is Kate?
« Last post by Izabella on Today at 03:29:44 PM »
Quote
Where is Kate?

My guess... She is out shopping.  :shrug: 
10
The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge / Re: Where Is Kate?
« Last post by KaTerina Montague on Today at 03:13:06 PM »
William and Kate's baby is more important and I have no idea how you can argue against facts. This child is the great grandchild of the Queen the child of a future King and a future monarch in its own right. Just because random baby to an unknown mother is more important to said mother doesn't change that millions of people are waiting for the birth of this child and will be watching every thing about him/her. I refuse to believe that you don't grasp the difference between the child on the neighbor down the street and the child of a future King whom millions of people are looking forward to. The birth alone is going to be written about in history books; not a single baby book put together by a morher. This baby is more important just like Estelle is and Prince Hishahito; though to be honest Hishahito is more important than WnKs child.
Pages: [1] 2 ... 10