Author Topic: No Baby This Year Says Catherine! (Read 2977 times)

angieuk · « **on:** January 29, 2012, 07:19:22 AM »

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2093275/William-Kate-baby-plans-hold-order-focus-Jubilee-Olympics.html

I believe this story to be true! No baby till late 2013.

Pippa doing charity work now apparently!

Sunny234 · « **Reply #1 on:** January 29, 2012, 11:14:12 AM »

No where did Catherine or William say there would be no baby nor did they or have they ever spoke of their conception plans. Thread title is incorrect and misleading.

iisuzieii · « **Reply #2 on:** January 29, 2012, 11:19:36 AM »

I agree. William didn't tell anyone including his brother when and if he would propose to Kate. So, I doubt they are sharing baby plans with any "source".

Getting married and babies are two things that I don't see him or Kate talking about with anyone. They are the only ones who know their plans.

Eri · « **Reply #3 on:** January 29, 2012, 12:24:20 PM »

Given that the BRF is over crowded anyways and it's not like other heirs are needed Id rather see her work start make her own mark she is still young the heirs will come eventually I don't know why the press is all over this it's only been 9 months.

Orchid · « **Reply #4 on:** January 30, 2012, 11:23:09 AM »

Of course the article is rumour and assumption. Most articles are. It's likely based on the preconception that the entire RF will be occupying themselves with the Jubilee and Olympics this year thus the media are hedging their bets that a child will be on the back burner.

They're both young and have plenty of time to conceive. It's just another media prediction game. First the proposal, then came the wedding date and details and now it's all about the baby. I just wonder what the media will do once they've created their little family and there's little left to predict

cinrit · « **Reply #5 on:** January 30, 2012, 11:34:02 AM »

^^ We'll have pictures of the family, like we did with Charles/Diana/William/Harry.

Cindy

Orchid · « **Reply #6 on:** January 30, 2012, 11:53:20 AM »

Yes we will, although that's not predictive which is what I was speaking of.

cinrit · « **Reply #7 on:** January 30, 2012, 11:58:24 AM »

Sure it is. The public will be anxious to see the baby's first steps, first words, first day at school, etc. ... the same as with Charles and Diana.

Cindy

Orchid · « **Reply #8 on:** January 30, 2012, 12:24:27 PM »

I'm not convinced people/the media will be predicting what the baby's first words will be or when it will take it's first steps. Where it will be schooled, perhaps.

tully5 · « **Reply #9 on:** January 30, 2012, 12:31:34 PM »

Good Morning All!

My thoughts on a new baby are... she will get pregnant this year birth will be early next year. Harry is the spare, who is going gung ho for the

front lines as fast as possible. Sorry to say Afghanistan is war he will be in danger every day. If Catherine were to get pregnant within the next

3 months we would not "find out" "CH" for 4 months theoretically. Year would be 3 quarters through. Missed everyone!

Orchid · « **Reply #10 on:** January 30, 2012, 12:39:33 PM »

Succinct. Good Morning, tully5! Or good afternoon, from my neck of the woods

I agree with your theory that the Jubilee and Olympics wouldn't necessarily stop them conceiving. People just don't put personal plans like that on hold because of national events.

Still, I find it odd to discuss their pregnancy plans. It's a little imposing and I have my limitations

snokitty · « **Reply #11 on:** January 30, 2012, 02:07:09 PM »

I am afraid that Clarence House may be preparing us for the fact that there will be no babies. Kate is awful thin to the point of starting to appear ill and biologically she is running out of time. I am sure they have probably had tests done and maybe just maybe they are wanting to let the public down gently.

Orchid · « **Reply #12 on:** January 30, 2012, 02:23:16 PM »

Hmm... I [personally] don't think that's the case. Yes, Kate is mighty thin and being underweight does affect fertility but that's nothing 14 lbs wouldn't sort out. And I wouldn't say she's running out of time at 30. Women are having children well into their 40's nowadays.

Welcome to the forum btw, snokitty

Eri · « **Reply #13 on:** January 30, 2012, 02:48:22 PM »

Something has been off about the baby thing from day one (at least in my opinion) but I think that even if one of them has problems conceiving they are very rich they have access to the best medicine can offer there is no doubt in my mind she will be pregnant in the near feature I see no reason why to obsess about it babies will come eventually.

Harryforlife25 · « **Reply #14 on:** January 30, 2012, 02:51:32 PM »

She is 30 for God sake how is she running out of time?

Women now days start having babies at 45 .

sandy · « **Reply #15 on:** January 30, 2012, 02:53:22 PM »

Why would William who clearly wants privacy or Kate (who from day one did not blab to the press about anything really personal) tell them when they are planning to conceive the baby? Doesn't make sense. next they will claim that WIlliam told them what contraceptives they use and when Kate's "fertile" times are. The press is out of line here.

RoyalB · « **Reply #16 on:** January 30, 2012, 04:22:55 PM »

^ The press might be out of line, Sandy, but it's par for the course, I'm afraid. As soon as they tied the knot, it was inevitable that the headlines would start to proliferate concerning when the couple might become pregnant! No surprises there, whatsoever.

Princess Pea · « **Reply #17 on:** January 30, 2012, 06:22:39 PM »

I read a key astrologer prediction patter of tiny feet 2013 pregnant 2012 but who cares I reckon she is desperate to conceive never mind Jubilee

snokitty · « **Reply #18 on:** January 30, 2012, 07:58:50 PM »

Since they have been together for so many years I was sure the reason for the wedding was that they had decided to start a family, or to take attention away from the bad publicity that Prince Andrew was getting right before the announcement. Women do have children past thirty but there is a greater chance of complications after the age of 30. They may never have children because there is a long line of other Royals to take the throne anyway. The Royal Family will make many changes when Charles becomes King so who knows what the future will bring.

Lindelle · « **Reply #19 on:** January 30, 2012, 08:15:49 PM »

I read somewhere - as usual I don't know where - that they were looking into having 'a little help' from professionals.
Ooooooohhhhhh- now THAT"S going to start the rumour mill.

Harryforlife25 · « **Reply #20 on:** January 30, 2012, 08:22:39 PM »

If there is a problem I see nothing wrong with them fixing it by getting help

other than that I am shocked to learn only 22 years old girls can get through a pregnancy you live and learn I guess

.

Lindelle · « **Reply #21 on:** January 30, 2012, 08:29:11 PM »

No of course there's nothing wrong with 'a little help'.
What do you mean by only 22 year old girls can get through a pregnancy?

snokitty · « **Reply #22 on:** January 30, 2012, 08:42:22 PM »

Where did you learn that only 22 year old girls can go through pregnancy. Speaking as someone who had their last one at 27 I can honestly tell you that is not true. Your source is wrong. Sorry

Quote from: snokitty on January 30, 2012, 08:45:05 PM

I am new to the whole forum thing and if I have offended youHarryforlife25, I apologize.

Posts merged. Please don't double post. If you want to add or change your post within 15 minutes, use the modify function. Any questions, send a PM to one of the mods. Thank you and welcome to the boards!

Eri · « **Reply #23 on:** January 30, 2012, 09:32:31 PM »

Age means nothing a pregnancy is a pregnancy no one is to say a 22 years old can't have problems conceiving or going through with a pregnancy just saying...

Harryforlife25 · « **Reply #24 on:** January 30, 2012, 09:38:02 PM »

@snokitty

Not "offended" at all it's just that I find the whole "her biological clock is ticking " thing amusing .