Author Topic: Kate Middleton, the Wedding Guest Who Seems to get It Right Every Time! (Read 2320 times)

angieuk · « **on:** September 23, 2009, 08:36:40 PM »

SHE'S GOT THE LOOK
Kate Middleton, the wedding guest who seems to get it right every time
October Issue - Majesty Magazine
www.majestymagazine.co.uk

Yes Kate seems to get it right every time at other people's wedding ... wonder if she will ever have a chance to get it right at her own wedding?
Not if William has anything to do with it it seems. William has never ever named any year as the right time, so if 2012 comes and goes with no engagement I will not be surprised in the slightest. Kate in any event I am sure will wait it out until 2020 if that's what it takes.

Georgiana · « **Reply #1 on:** September 23, 2009, 08:50:08 PM »

I dont think we will have too long to wait for her to get it right at her own wedding

Jayhawk · « **Reply #2 on:** September 23, 2009, 09:30:01 PM »

If she doesn't get to get it right at her own ceremony, I wonder if she'll feel gypped. Here is a good question I haven't seen be posed before: WILL SHE WATCH THE WEDDING IF HE MARRIES SOMEONE ELSE???????????????????? Would you if it were you? Could she take it? Or maybe she would be invited. Camilla was to PC and Diana's wedding.

Alixxx · « **Reply #3 on:** September 24, 2009, 01:19:28 AM »

^ It would be intolerable cruelty for any girl who has dated a guy for upwards of two-three years and expected marriage at the end of it to have to watch him marry someone else. Factor in issues such as the fact that Wills' marriage would be publicised like crazy, there will be throngs of people waiting for days outside the chapel to see his blushing bride and pictures of her in her fairytale dress will be splashed everywhere and you've got a recipe to send the poor KM crazy if she doesn't marry him. However, I really can't seem him marrying anyone else.

angieuk · « **Reply #4 on:** September 24, 2009, 04:34:56 AM »

I feel confident Zara will marry Mike;
I feel confident Beatrice will marry Dave;
I feel confident to a certain extent Harry will get back with Chelsy;

BUT for some reason I don't feel the same way about William and Kate ... if they do marry though I feel Kate still has a good 2 years to wait and anything can happen in that time or other people may come into the picture. Also I feel that Charles wants William to hold off on marriage for as long as possible.

Jayhawk · « **Reply #5 on:** September 24, 2009, 04:48:58 PM »

Quote from: Alixxx on September 24, 2009, 01:19:28 AM

^ It would be intolerable cruelty for any girl who has dated a guy for upwards of two-three years and expected marriage at the end of it to have to watch him marry someone else. Factor in issues such as the fact that Wills' marriage would be publicised like crazy, there will be throngs of people waiting for days outside the chapel to see his blushing bride and pictures of her in her fairytale dress will be splashed everywhere and you've got a recipe to send the poor KM crazy if she doesn't marry him. However, I really can't seem him marrying anyone else.

Cruel, sort of. She could have jumped ship. There aren't guarantees in life.

4321BAM · « **Reply #6 on:** September 24, 2009, 11:18:11 PM »

^ Oh my goodness we are so quick to feel sorry for the girl; as if she has nothing to do with being with him and as if it will happen

sandy · « **Reply #7 on:** September 25, 2009, 12:09:16 AM »

Kate must still be "in" if Seward fawns all over her in Majesty Magazine. I iwish the magazine would write more historical artricles instead of all the sycophantic fawning over a royal girlfriend.,

Jayhawk · « **Reply #8 on:** September 25, 2009, 03:22:27 PM »

I think Ingrid Seward will talk about Kate as long as Kate shows up in photos. It's a space-filler.

Sidney · « **Reply #9 on:** September 25, 2009, 06:10:13 PM »

I don't know why but I think Kate will be a very beautiful bride. In my country we say that it's impossible por a bride not to look beautiful on her wedding day (and, in some ways, it's true).

Orchid · « **Reply #10 on:** September 25, 2009, 07:56:34 PM »

Is is usual for girlfriends to feature in Majesty magazine? I thought the publication was more selective about who is featured, i.e. only official figures.

But yes, I agree, Kate does hit the right note when it comes to wedding attire.

Jayne · « **Reply #11 on:** September 29, 2009, 01:28:41 PM »

Wait, is this article for real?

Hale · « **Reply #12 on:** October 02, 2009, 07:33:10 PM »

Quote from: sandy on September 25, 2009, 12:09:16 AM

I iwish the magazine would write more historical artricles .,

In total agreement.

Alixxx · « **Reply #13 on:** October 03, 2009, 01:00:20 AM »

Historical articles would be so nice to have since they are so difficult to find and few publications cover such topics at present. Articles about royal girlfriends do seem rather tabloidish in nature esp. since these girls are quasi-celebrities of sorts and NOT royals. But then again, form a sales point of view, while Queen Mary's 'kleptomania' might be interesting, Kate Middleton's fashion tips might just be more the more sought after of the two so it's probably about keeping up sales and the survival of the magazine and all that.

evabee73 · « **Reply #14 on:** October 03, 2009, 05:46:03 PM »

Quote from: Hale on October 02, 2009, 07:33:10 PM

Quote from: sandy on September 25, 2009, 12:09:16 AM
I iwish the magazine would write more historical artricles .,
In total agreement.

That would be a good read!

Lucy · « **Reply #15 on:** October 03, 2009, 07:01:51 PM »

Oh good grief!! ANYTHING to slam Kate again and complain even about her appearance in a magazine which features girlfriends and boyfriends of OTHER Royals as well.
Majesty is primarily CURRENT NEWS....Soooooooooooooooooo,
If you wish to read Royal History....Simple....look for this Royal mag:

http://www.royalty-magazine.com/

Albeit, beware Kate Middleton and Chelsy Davy appear in it as well....so just have a friend black-out all the current stuff so you can read dated material available in the history section of most libraries.

Alixxx · « **Reply #16 on:** October 03, 2009, 09:20:22 PM »

Lucy, no one was slamming Kate. As someone who has an avid interest in the Romanovs, Windsors and Hapsburgs it's just nice to find a publication that actually covers them. I think the statement would have been made at some point if ANY royal bf/gf had appeared.

teachkid · « **Reply #17 on:** October 04, 2009, 06:55:44 PM »

I would love to subscribe, but holy cow! that's a lot of moolah for what, only 12 issues?

Lucy · « **Reply #18 on:** October 04, 2009, 07:09:06 PM »

Oh yes, Kate was singled out sspecifically for complaint, as per usual, by the usual distractors, whilst Majesty mag has written about literally dozens of other Royal girlfriends and no one EVER grumbled about THEM on here.

Too true, Teachkid, a lot of lolly....maybe a special Charistmas prezzie?
Sooo nice to see ya. Lady !!!

Alixxx · « **Reply #19 on:** October 04, 2009, 09:25:27 PM »

^ I have not read any publications in Majesty before Lucy hence the reason I have not metnioned such a thing before. Forgive my apparent ignorance and please do not insinuate that I am a Kate detractor because I have tried to be objective when discussing her. Now if we can please change the topic...

Hale · « **Reply #20 on:** October 04, 2009, 10:27:55 PM »

Quote from: teachkid on October 04, 2009, 06:55:44 PM

I would love to subscribe, but holy cow! that's a lot of moolah for what, only 12 issues?

With regards to Majesty magazine, if you are an American I understand the yearly subscription is $66. Is that so expensive? In the UK the yearly fee is £28. You can't get a decent theatre seat for that price. They do some history, but I do think they could do more and a lot better.

Quote from: Jayhawk on September 23, 2009, 09:30:01 PM

If she doesn't get to get it right at her own ceremony, I wonder if she'll feel gypped. Here is a good question I haven't seen be posed before: WILL SHE WATCH THE WEDDING IF HE MARRIES SOMEONE ELSE???????????????????? Would you if it were you? Could she take it? Or maybe she would be invited. Camilla was to PC and Diana's wedding.

Hey Jayhawk, sorry, but I couldn't resist responding in my own way to your post. Click the link

sandy · « **Reply #21 on:** October 04, 2009, 11:04:09 PM »

I actually gave up even buying an issue when Ingrid Seward started doing hatchet jobs on the late Princess Diana. I even wrote the editor saying I was through buying issues. I glance at them on the newsstand and I'm not even tempted to buy an issue--too many pics of Camilla.

I used to enjoy the historical articles a great deal. Royalty Magazine used to have them and now they write about movie stars more than actual royals!

evabee73 · « **Reply #22 on:** October 04, 2009, 11:39:04 PM »

Quote from: Hale on October 04, 2009, 10:27:55 PM

Quote from: teachkid on October 04, 2009, 06:55:44 PM
I would love to subscribe, but holy cow! that's a lot of moolah for what, only 12 issues?

With regards to Majesty magazine, if you are an American I understand the yearly subscription is $66. Is that so expensive? In the UK the yearly fee is £28. You can't get a decent theatre seat for that price. They do some history, but I do think they could do more and a lot better.

Quote from: Jayhawk on September 23, 2009, 09:30:01 PM
If she doesn't get to get it right at her own ceremony, I wonder if she'll feel gypped. Here is a good question I haven't seen be posed before: WILL SHE WATCH THE WEDDING IF HE MARRIES SOMEONE ELSE???????????????????? Would you if it were you? Could she take it? Or maybe she would be invited. Camilla was to PC and Diana's wedding.

Hey Jayhawk, sorry, but I couldn't resist responding in my own way to your post. Click the link

that's £12.67 more in the US.

Decent Theater seats without breaking the bank in the US £55.53
-That's what I would pay, maybe even more. Might be much for some people.

Professional Sports, exp.Baseball games....Good seats £47.33

Movie theater seats....£6.31

Hale · « **Reply #23 on:** October 05, 2009, 01:17:29 PM »

Thanks evabee 73 for explaining that to me.

Perhaps we should start are own Royal magazine.