Author Topic: Duke and Duchess of Cambridge enjoy pitter patter of tiny paws (Read 1700 times)

iisuzieii · « **on:** January 30, 2012, 08:34:58 PM »

http://www.express.co.uk/features/view/299039/Duke-and-Duchess-of-Cambridge-enjoy-pitter-patter-of-tiny-paws

I guess the new addition is confirmed...and LOL at the title of the article. Its a cute puppy.

Georgiana · « **Reply #1 on:** January 31, 2012, 05:57:49 AM »

very cute!

Orchid · « **Reply #2 on:** January 31, 2012, 12:41:10 PM »

Quote

AFTER weeks of speculation St James’s Palace has finally confirmed the news that the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge are enjoying the pitter patter of tiny paws in their Anglesey home.

Whatever next. The Palace confirming the news of a canine addition. We live in a daft world.

Blue Clover · « **Reply #3 on:** January 31, 2012, 12:52:11 PM »

Major announcement!

Lothwen · « **Reply #4 on:** January 31, 2012, 07:58:24 PM »

I'm so glad they confirmed this. I've been sitting on pins and needles ever since we saw those pics of them walking on the beach. Is that their new dog? What kind of dog is it? Will they be hiring a royal dog pooper-scooper? Where can I apply for that job? Will we see Princess Kate walking the dog around Buckingham Palace? When will she be moving into Buckingham Palace? Does getting a new puppy mean that Princess Kate and Prince William are ready to have children? When will they have children? Is Princess Kate pregnant? What will the new baby's name be? I need to know! I need to know!!

So, yeah, I'm glad the palace cleared that up for us

sophiechloe · « **Reply #5 on:** January 31, 2012, 08:01:47 PM »

Oh yeah - I'll be sleeping easy tonight - Thank Goodness!

Orchid · « **Reply #6 on:** January 31, 2012, 11:16:42 PM »

If I weren't so cynical and jaded myself I'd be asking you two ladies for the name of your sardonic pills

naniwi · « **Reply #7 on:** February 01, 2012, 05:43:31 PM »

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2094868/Kate-Middleton-Prince-William-adopt-pet-Cocker-Spaniel-remains-mystery.html

FanDianaFancy · « **Reply #8 on:** February 01, 2012, 06:47:03 PM »

http://www.baltimoresun.com/entertainment/ktla-kate-middleton-pregnant,0,5569999.story?obref=obinsite

And in other news, American tabloid

mag, In Touch, reports that Kate is expecting her first child.
She is about 6 weeks along.

Keep in mind while reading this, American weekly's have been having Kate preggars for about 2 years

now.
LOL.

OPPS, that article was from Nov., 2011

Well, anyway, keep it for the mags should be writing this story again. Every 3 months seems like a good story to write.
With the puppy news, new adition, I am sure many mags, papers, will do these little teaser headlines.

Oh, why believe an official announcement

of anything from TBRF 's PTB, their official news released spokesperson, when you have these magazines. LOL!!!

Editing revoked. Our apologies

Princess Pea · « **Reply #9 on:** February 01, 2012, 07:13:30 PM »

If there is this much attention over a Yuppy Puppy what's it going to be like when she turns into a Yummy Mummy.

FanDianaFancy · « **Reply #10 on:** February 02, 2012, 12:03:28 AM »

Cute play on words there PrinPea. Made me

Deleted. Do NOT debate or complain about the moderating decisions on the boards. If you have a concern please send a PM

sophiechloe · « **Reply #11 on:** February 05, 2012, 10:00:24 AM »

PRINCE WILLIAM AND KATE SHOULD TAKE LEAD FROM THE QUEEN - by : Camilla Tominey

Read More

wannable · « **Reply #12 on:** February 05, 2012, 09:47:54 PM »

Quote

IkonPictures Niraj Tanna
@CamillaTominey makes a valid point that this has nothing to do with the name of a dog but the right to express free speech.
9 hours ago
in reply to ↑

@theroyaleditor
Robert Jobson
@IkonPictures @camillatominey Do we know all the names of the Queen's dogs? Don't think we can go press freedom crusade over a pups name.
8 hours ago via Twitter for iPhone
replies ↓

IkonPictures Niraj Tanna
@
@theroyaleditor @CamillaTominey I agree but the article asks some serious question. Who really cares about the dog?
8 hours ago

Quote

@CamillaTominey
Camilla Tominey
if they want to frolic, fine- just don't expect it not to be snapped if it's in public. Tks for tweeting x
3 hours ago via Twitter for BlackBerry®
replies ↓

theroyaleditor Robert Jobson
@CamillaTominey @marilynsrylblog Not as simple as that. harassment is a legitimate complaint if is is truly harassment. A fine line.
3 hours ago

In this instance, I'm in agreement with Robert Jobson.

Wilkat · « **Reply #13 on:** February 07, 2012, 10:16:36 PM »

A small note to Camilla Tominey:

The public's right to know? The public has a Right To Know a dog's name? Since when? The idea is crazy. Must we also know which treats the little beast likes to scarf down? Which sort of doggie shampoo he prefers? Is he house trained? Crazy !

Get real.

XeniaCasaraghi · « **Reply #14 on:** February 08, 2012, 01:30:26 AM »

This is what our forefathers fought for! The right to know the name of a dog. I'm taking this to the courts.

cinrit · « **Reply #15 on:** February 09, 2012, 11:07:29 PM »

^^

Cindy

Lothwen · « **Reply #16 on:** February 09, 2012, 11:10:25 PM »

If you read some of Camilla Tominey's tweets, she does say that it's not about the dog, but rather that William seems to try to control the press.

http://twitter.com/CamillaTominey

wannable · « **Reply #17 on:** February 09, 2012, 11:14:11 PM »

But her article used the primary example of the dog, which in my view was her down-fall/posterior trying to recover explanation through tweets.

No one's perfect, professional mistake perhaps?!

Lothwen · « **Reply #18 on:** February 09, 2012, 11:14:42 PM »

Maybe she used that as an example because it was the most recent?

wannable · « **Reply #19 on:** February 09, 2012, 11:16:36 PM »

Which has two sided view, those who like/defended her public/private media/paparazzi stance and those who think she committed a professional journalistic faux pass.

cinrit · « **Reply #20 on:** February 09, 2012, 11:21:27 PM »

How is not wanting the public to know the name of his personal pet a matter of controlling the press? Such a big deal over not knowing the name of the dog, who is happily living his life not even knowing yet that he has a name.

Cindy

wannable · « **Reply #21 on:** February 09, 2012, 11:24:12 PM »

Precisely the other sided view.

Lothwen · « **Reply #22 on:** February 09, 2012, 11:24:53 PM »

I don't think it was about the name of the dog as much as it was the complaint about the pictures being published. Will and Kate cried harrassment over pictures taken with a wide-range lens on a public beach.

wannable · « **Reply #23 on:** February 09, 2012, 11:27:34 PM »

Did they? I thought royal correspondents (fleet street) had called SJP to find out about the dog, and SJP said "Yes, the dog is theirs", the end.

I don't or missed the evidence to the bruhaha 'puppygate'.

Lothwen · « **Reply #24 on:** February 09, 2012, 11:31:57 PM »

Camilla Tominey mentioned it on Twitter, as did Tanna (don't remember his first name-he's the guy who took the pics of Kate playing tennis on Christmas a couple of years ago). I don't think it was in the news though